Scharfe Kritik des israelischen Präsidenten Reuven Rivlin an Regierung

Der israelische Präsident Reuven Rivlin hat in einer Rede zum Ende der Sommerpause im israelischen Parlament scharfe Kritik an der israelischen Regierung geübt.

The central message of Rivlin’s speech was what he could not help but describe as „a continuous attempt to weaken the gatekeepers of the Israeli democracy.“ „We are witnessing the winds of change, or a second revolution. This time, the majority rule is the only ruler. The whole country and its institutions are full of politics. This revolution seeks to finally rip the mask of alleged hypocrisy off the gatekeepers. In
this revolution, the ruler is also the victim. ‚We’ll show them‘ is the soundtrack of the revolution. The stateliness has gone from our country, after us the deluge,“ the president added. (…) He spoke of a chasm „between the responsible attempt to the define, after many years, the breach in the relationship between the legislative and judicial branches; to delineate judicial criticism; to ask questions about the mechanism of appointing judges to reach a more varied and representative judges‘ panel, and between attempts to terrorize the court and weaken it, to actively invite the public to undermine its authorities and rulings.

Der gesamte Kommentar findet sich auf den Seiten von Ynet News:,7340,L-5032963,00.html

Chemi Shalev (Haaretz) kontrastiert Rivlins Rede mit dem offenkundigen Desinteresse der Minister in der Knesset:

Senior ministers were demonstrably uninterested in Rivlin’s speech, joking and sniggering amongst themselves in the Knesset hall as if they weren’t the first addressees on Rivlin’s list. The next day they sent out their attack dogs to cast the president as yet another traitor and left wing appeaser who is simply settling personal scores with Netanyahu. That’s more convenient, of course, than looking in the mirror that Rivlin held up to their faces and seeing the instigators, collaborators and enablers of a right wing putsch against Israeli democracy.

Reaktionen in Israel auf das Abschneiden der AfD bei den Bundestagswahlen

Eine erste Stellungnahme in Auszügen zum Abschneiden der AfD bei den Bundestagswahlen von Moshe Zimmerman und Shimon Stein in Haaretz vom 25. September.

Why Israel Won’t Condemn the Shocking Success of Germany’s Far-right Extremists

After its improper, evasive, even complicit responses to Charlottesville, to Trump and to Hungary’s anti-Semitic anti-Soros campaign, it’s no surprise that Israel’s response to neo-Nazis in the Bundestag is a deafening silence

Here Israel cannot waver: The AfD politicians pulled the usual trick – they were also eager to show their support for Israel or brag about Jews joining the party, and on top of it referred to the „common adversary“: the mainly Muslim refugees/infiltrators ‚flooding‘ into Germany. Will this bear-hug do the trick? No objective observer can have any doubts: This alleged alliance against Muslims or Arabs, suggested by the AfD and other populists, is a pitfall which Israel must avoid at all costs. Not only is it an imagined alliance; it is a betrayal of the fight against anti-Semitism and of the basic human values of Zionism. Israelis should have shown more esteem for Angela Merkel’s welcome gesture towards the refugees. A blind eye to racism and intolerance in Germany, in Europe, for the sake of getting support for the present Israeli policies in the occupied territories is a disgrace. The AfD is more than just another populist, racist European Party. It is a movement that intends to turn the clock back on democratic Germany’s effort to learn from its terrible past for the sake of an enlightened and tolerant future. Official Israel must to join the anti-AfD majority in Germany in its fight against the enemies of an open society.

Den vollständigen Artikel findet sich im Premium-Angebot von Haaretz.

Das Kalenderblatt im Oktober 2017

An dieser Stelle präsentieren wir zu jedem Monatsanfang ein neues Kalenderblatt aus dem diAk-Kalender für das Jahr 2017 (erschienen als Ausgabe IV/2016) – mit vielen Photos und Geschichten zu den Personen und Projekten hinter der Initiative Combatants for Peace.

Im Oktober werden die Aktivitäten und Proteste der Qalquilya-Tel Aviv-Gruppe der Combatants porträtiert.


A letter from Amos Schocken

Ein Aufruf des Haaretz-Herausgebers Amos Schocken anläßlich des zwanzigjährigen Jubiläum der englischsprachigen Ausgabe zur Bedeutung von kritischem Journalismus in unserer heutigen Zeit.

On September 1, 1997, Haaretz English Edition was published for the first time, as part of a joint venture with the International Herald Tribune.

On the front page of the inaugural edition were two reports which encapsulated the very reasons that we, the publishers of Israel’s oldest daily newspaper, decided to venture into English-language publishing.

In the first article, the paper’s diplomatic correspondent reported that the United States was pressing Israel to accept a formula by which settlement expansion would be limited to existing communities. The second article reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had been seeking a private donation to help him pay an outstanding debt to the lawyer who had represented him in court.

Two decades later, despite the best efforts of many courageous people and organizations, and notwithstanding spectacular advances in many fields, Israel is no nearer a solution to many of its most pressing problems.

One of the charges most often levelled against the voices of opposition in Israel is that they ‘air the country’s dirty laundry’ in public – and in English. They are told that to do so is treasonous and feeds the monster of anti-Semitism.

Haaretz is proud to be one of the few critical voices in Israel – and in English – speaking out against injustice. We believe that we are serving the best interests of our country, which we love, and that our reporting, our analysis and our commentary enrich the discussion and deepen our readers’ understanding of hugely complex issues. Our writers – in English and Hebrew – are Israel’s most thought-provoking and original and our digital platforms are updated around the clock by two news desks.

In today’s climate, the voice of Haaretz is more important than ever before, both here in Israel and in the United States, where recent events are of grave concern to Jews in both countries. That is why it is just as important for Haaretz’s voice to be heard in English.

With your continued support, we will continue to produce the kind of journalism that is vital in these perilous times. We will continue to create cutting-edge multimedia content on all our platforms and we will continue to invest in making our apps and websites even better.

Yours faithfully,

Amos Schocken
Publisher, Haaretz

Zum Jubiläum bietet die Zeitung das digitale Abo für im Sonderangebot an.


Das Kalenderblatt im September 2017

An dieser Stelle präsentieren wir zu jedem Monatsanfang ein neues Kalenderblatt aus dem diAk-Kalender für das Jahr 2017 (erschienen als Ausgabe IV/2016) – mit vielen Photos und Geschichten zu den Personen und Projekten hinter der Initiative Combatants for Peace. Im September berichtet Avner von der Möglichkeit, in der Begegnung und besonders während des israelisch-palästinensischen Gedenktages der Opfer des Konfliktes gemeinsam zu gedenken.


Steigende Spannungen um die ‚Holy Esplanade‘

Mit Blick auf die sich weiter steigenden Spannungen um die ‚Holy Esplanade‘ in der Altstadt und das bevorstehende Freitagsgebet, das zweite seit dem Beginn der Spannungen, sei das Statement von Ir Amim zur Lektüre empfohlen.

Besonders der Satz

What is important to underscore is that perception matters and all events that happen on the Temple Mount / Haram al-Sharif will be seen through the political lenses of the multiple parties involved.

sollte den politisch Verantwortlichen einleuchten.

‚Game Changer?‘ Naomi Chazan über die Wahl von Avi Gabbay

Neben den seit Tagen andauernden Unruhen und den ‚Status Quo‘ in der Jerusalemer Altstadt (siehe israel & palästina I 2016) ist die Nachricht über den Ausgang der parteinternen Wahlen der israelischen Arbeitspartei hierzulande ziemlich untergegangen. Naomi Chazan legt in ihrem Blogeintrag für die Times of Israel eine lesenswerte Analyse zur Wahl des ‚Außenseiters‘ und Neulings in der Partei, Avi Gabbay, vor.