Eine andere Sicht

Hoffen wir, daß es nicht nur ein Pfeifen im Wald ist, die politischen Mehrheiten gibt es jedenfalls (noch?) nicht …

The Palestinian economy is in collapse. Hamas is regaining control over the limited existing resources and assets in the Gaza Strip, after the war destroyed Gaza’s economic system. In the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority (PA) is struggling to survive amid deliberate Israeli government policy that is exploiting the former’s dependence and advancing unilateral coercive measures to cripple the Palestinian economy and the PA itself.

This policy reflects a dangerous escalation of the Israeli approach that viewed Hamas as an asset and the PA as a burden, an approach whose beginnings predated October 7, 2023. The collapse of the PA and the Palestinian economy are openly touted by Israeli ministers as elements of a strategy designed to advance annexation and prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, even at the cost of a stronger Hamas and critical damage to Israeli security.

This paper, written by Yitzhak Gal, proposes a new policy and includes pragmatic recommendations for action that will mend Israeli-Palestinian economic relations while supporting progress on a phased process toward two states and stable, long-term security. The proposed strategy is based on reform and socioeconomic stabilization of the PA within regional collaborative arrangements.

The paper illustrates the strong link between Palestinian economic growth and the security relations between Israel and the Palestinians. On this foundation, the paper proposes a three-stage road map whose goal is gradual building of a strong Palestinian economy; which will function as an independent system, while maintaining close cooperation with Israel and other countries in the region. That will contribute both to Palestinian and Israeli stability and prosperity.

A necessary condition for implementation of this roadmap is a political will in Israel to change its approach toward the Palestinians and to make strides in a process directed at socioeconomic and political stabilization. Therefore, the plan can only be implemented under an Israeli government that is willing to adopt a policy that is entirely different from the current government’s policy.

Nevertheless, even under the current government, there are several critical steps that can be performed almost immediately. These steps are proposed in the first stage of the road map, concurrently with Stage 2 of President Trumps’ 20- point peace plan. These steps will be part of US-led measures to implement UN Security Council Resolution 2803 with respect to Gaza.

The concrete measures proposed for the first stage are: Resolution of the PA’s protracted fiscal crisis in order to allow full and timely wage payments and orderly delivery of public services; gradual re-entry of Palestinian workers into Israel for employment while implementing agreed changes to improve security arrangements; suspension of measures that impair the Palestinian banking system and application of new arrangements that will stabilize this critical system; as well as measures that would leverage the rebuilding of Gaza to jump-start the Palestinian economy, with emphasis on trade and logistics. The execution of these steps will be contingent on a comprehensive, effective reform of the PA, cessation of payments to prisoners and “martyrs” (shaheeds), and tight security coordination that ensures demilitarization in Gaza and the marginalization of Hamas.

In the second stage, additional set of measures that can be promoted under the umbrella of the Oslo Accords and the Paris Protocol. These measures will include: convening of the joint Israeli-Palestinian economic committee and the additional joint subcommittees defined in the Paris Protocol and accompanying agreements, for development of agreed future plans; phased promotion of economic links between Gaza and the West Bank, contingent on accepted security arrangements; establishment of special-economic-status industrial zones and free trade areas; signing of preferential trade arrangements with the UAE and Saudi Arabia, the EU, and the US; promotion of Palestinian and Israeli integration into regional economic projects, primarily the reconstruction of Gaza and the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).

The third stage will focus on a new Israeli-Palestinian economic agreement, under US-international-regional aegis. The new economic agreement will be negotiated as part of an agreed path to the future establishment of a demilitarized Palestinian state, and as an integral element of a regional settlement. This economic agreement will replace the Paris Protocol and its accompanying set of agreements as well as the multiple unliteral arrangements that have evolved over the past 30 years. This stage, which is proposed to take place over a longer term (3–4 years), will include issues such as a permanent trade regime, the currency of the PA, and other significant changes in the structure of the Palestinian economy.

Implementation of the proposed plan will drive the Palestinian economy forward, strengthen the moderate actors in the Palestinian arena, and support the socioeconomic stability that is a necessary condition for a stable settlement and long-term security.

The proposed plan also offers a set of additional significant benefits for Israel: The plan will lead to a strong and stable PA that maintains effective rule in the West Bank, that constitutes an effective alternative to Hamas in the Gaza Strip, is committed to peace with Israel, and is a partner in effective anti-terror measures. Implementation of the plan will dilute the power of Hamas and other extremist groups in Gaza and the West Bank.

The gradual nature of the process, which is directed toward a clear political horizon and its progress based on the achievement of clear milestones, will build confidence and trust and create a system with long-lasting stability.

Israel’s integration as an important actor in comprehensive regional initiatives, such as IMEC, is expected to be an important growth engine for Israel’s economy for decades to come.

Israelis for Peace

Open Letter for German Action Against Human Rights Violations in the West Bank & More Updates

In the last days, we’ve been collecting signatures for an open letter against the atrocities in the West Bank. Here is a part of it:

“Since the announcement of a fragile ceasefire in Gaza in October 2025, international attention has largely shifted away from the region. However, the Israeli government has continued to severely violate the ceasefire and its human rights obligations, in Gaza and in the occupied West Bank. We call upon Germany, one of Israel’s closest allies, to fulfill its own obligations under international law and its commitment to human rights by acting decisively against these ongoing atrocities.

The situation in the West Bank is deteriorating rapidly. In recent months, there has been a surge in settler violence against Palestinians, particularly targeting herding communities in Area C. These attacks – which include the daily harassment of farmers, targeting of humanitarian activists – Israelis and internationals – and organized raids on Palestinian villages – often occur with the tacit agreement or active assistance of the Israeli military. According to the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem, more than 44 communities have been displaced since October 2023.

Germany holds a unique position of influence in the West Bank as a primary financial supporter of both the Palestinian Authority and local civil society. While the U.S. has turned a blind eye to the escalation of extremist violence and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, the many military raids on cities and villages in the region must not enjoy tacit international approval. We urge Germany to shift its policy and pressure Israel to cease the annexation and human rights violations.

Mehr

Zu Berlinale Zeiten …

***

Und „passend“ dazu ein Beitrag von Hanno Hauenstein auf seinem Blug null.punkt

How the Berlinale Jury’s Turn to “Neutrality” Exposed the Limits of Solidarity in Germany’s Cultural Sphere

Jüdisch, postsowjetisch, besatzungskritisch sucht …

Im Nachgang zu unserem DienstagsZoom am 3. Februar, hier ein Beitrag der Autorin in der taz vom 15. Februar 2026

Ein:Blick von außen …

Foreign Affairs (hg. vom Council on Foreign Relations New York), seit 1922 eine der wichtigsten Publikationen zu Fragen der Internationalen Politik aus den USA. hat die Ausgabe März&April 2026 deutscher Politik gewidmet, lesenswert und vielleicht doch geeoignet, die ein oder ander Debatte hierzulande noch einmal zu überdenken…

Über deutsche Rüstungsexporte

Eine Pressemitteilung des European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) Berlin

Am Donnerstag, den 12. Februar 2026, entscheidet das Bundesverfassungsgericht über eine vom European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) und palästinensischen Partnerorganisationen unterstützte Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen deutsche Rüstungsexporte nach Israel. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Frage, ob Menschen, deren Leben durch den Einsatz deutscher Waffen in Gaza bedroht ist, gegen deutsche Rüstungsgenehmigungen vorgehen können. 

Der Beschwerdeführer, ein palästinensischer Zivilist aus Gaza, wendet sich gegen Exportgenehmigungen für deutsche Panzergetriebeteile, die für israelische Merkava-Panzer bestimmt sind. Solche Panzer werden in Gaza eingesetzt. Die Verwaltungsgerichte wiesen seine Eilanträge bislang mit der Begründung zurück, er habe kein eigenes Rechtsschutzbedürfnis.

Das Bundesverfassungsgericht muss nun entscheiden, ob der so verwehrte Rechtsschutz mit dem Grundgesetz vereinbar ist. Kernfrage des Verfahrens ist, ob staatliche Entscheidungen über Rüstungsexporte gerichtlich überprüfbar sein müssen, wenn dadurch Grundrechte von Menschen gefährdet werden – auch dann, wenn diese außerhalb Deutschlands leben. Relevant wird insofern ein anderer Fall, den das ECCHR unterstützt hatte: In seiner Entscheidung zur US-Airbase Ramstein stellte das Bundesverfassungsgericht klar, dass Deutschland auch im Ausland grundrechtliche Schutzpflichten treffen können. Diese Maßstäbe sind nun auf Rüstungsexporte anzuwenden. 

Bedeutung für die Situation in Gaza 

Der Beschwerdeführer, der bei israelischen Angriffen seine Frau und sein Kind verloren hat, lebt mit seinen verbliebenen Familienmitgliedern in Gaza in ständiger Gefahr durch fast tägliche militärische Angriffe – auch auf seine Umgebung. Die anhaltende humanitäre Katastrophe wird durch winterliche Kälte und das angekündigte Tätigkeitsverbot für viele humanitäre Hilfsorganisationen – wie etwa gegen Ärzte ohne Grenzen – zusätzlich verschärft. Für ihn und Millionen Menschen in Gaza ist die Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts keine abstrakte juristische Frage.  

Der im Oktober 2025 verkündete sog. Waffenstillstand hat den Menschen in Gaza keine Sicherheit gebracht. Nach Angaben internationaler Organisationen wurden seitdem mehr als 574 Menschen getötet, darunter über 100 Kinder. Luftangriffe, Beschuss und militärische Operationen dauern an: Allein am 4. Februar töteten israelische Angriffe durch Panzer und Bombardierungen mindestens 24 Menschen, darunter sieben Kinder. Erst Tage zuvor hatten israelische Angriffe mindestens 32 Menschen in Gaza getötet, die meisten von ihnen Frauen und Kinder. 

Wie aktuelle Medienberichte zeigen, werden Ersatzteile wie die deutschen Panzergetriebeteile nach der Lieferung nach Israel unverzüglich im “Kampfgebiet”, also in Gaza, in Panzer eingebaut: Solche Ersatzteile lagern demnach nicht “einfach in Regalen in Israel”. 

Bedeutung der Entscheidung 

Die Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts wird klären, inwieweit deutsche Gerichte den Schutz von Menschenrechten gegenüber politischen und wirtschaftlichen Interessen durchsetzen. Sie ist damit wegweisend für zahlreiche weitere Verfahren, in denen Betroffene effektiven Rechtsschutz gegen staatliche Entscheidungen mit gravierenden menschenrechtlichen Folgen verlangen. 

Unabhängig vom Ausgang des Verfahrens bleibt Deutschland verpflichtet, seine Rüstungsexportpolitik mit dem Grundgesetz und dem Völkerrecht in Einklang zu bringen. Als zweitgrößter Waffenlieferant Israels trägt Deutschland konkrete Mitverantwortung für die menschenrechtlichen Folgen dieser Exporte.

„Die Entscheidung wird zeigen, ob Menschen aus Gaza, deren Grundrechte durch deutsche Rüstungsexporte bedroht sind, Zugang zu deutschen Gerichten erhalten, und ob Gerichte künftig ernsthaft prüfen müssen, ob deutsche Exporte Zivilisten gefährden“, so Dr. Alexander Schwarz, Co-Programmleiter Völkerstraftaten und rechtliche Verantwortung beim ECCHR.  

Das ECCHR unterstützt den Beschwerdeführer gemeinsam mit den palästinensischen Menschenrechtsorganisationen Al-Haq, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights und dem Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR). 

On Mike Huckabee

A reflection of Rifat Kassis (Kairos Palestine) on the US Ambassador to Israel

Additional Background information about the statesment of the Head of Churches

Über das Völkerrecht und Deutschland …

DJfdV Online Seminar27. Januar 2026

Helpful or Harmful?

We’re starting from a shared premise: contact alone is not enough. If dialogue is meant to encourage participants to critically examine reality and imagine change, it must be intentionally designed and carefully facilitated. But that raises a central dilemma:
Is dialogue most effective when it happens together or separately?

Both having begun their own journeys as participants in dialogue groups and working their way up to leadership positions, our speakers bring deep, lived experience from the field:

Lana Ikelan, Co-Director of Seeds of Peace Jerusalem (formerly Kids4Peace), engages young people across deep asymmetries of power and narrative.
Dina Gardashkin, former Co-Director of Sadaka-Reut, confronts inequality, education, and political responsibility.

Together with Lana and Dina, questions such as will be explored:
• How does the group setting impact the process participants undergo?
• What kinds of transformation are possible only in mixed groups or only in separate groups?
• What are the risks and limitations of each framework?

🗓 Sunday, January 25, 2026 | 8 pm Jerusalem time (19.00 Uhr MEZ)

Link to register:
https://us02web.zoom.us/…/register/ro4qFnh1RhqE7PpV2vdNaA

This conversation is for educators, facilitators, activists, donors, and anyone grappling seriously with what dialogue can — and cannot — do in our current reality.

Telephonführung „Bei Anruf Kultur“

Mehr Informationen | Oft schnell ausgebucht!